Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mindi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 ------- Additional Comments From bruno.cornec@xxxxxx 2007-04-29 11:18 EST ------- I still stand on my earlier comments: you've not understood what is mindi's goal, not why I need to control the way busybox is built. I don't use whatever busybox, I make a special binary based on busybox hold under rootfs/sbin that will be use at restore time. You asked to not have a binary in the tree, and I agreed on that, even if it wasn't a priority for the project. Now let me use what I need, no what you would like us to do !! We're not here to discuss on upstream functions but to package an existing app ! Now, I think I won't pass any more time on this. After all people wanting to use it on fedore have packages since a long time, and use them. My goal was to make it easy for fedore users. You disagree. That's fine. I'll rather work on creating repodata info and config files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review