https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Josef Stribny from comment #5) > Mamoru, I talked with Vit briefly and we discussed the naming scheme for > these RSpec 2 packages. Don't you think it would be better to name them as: > > rubygem-rspec-core2 > rubygem-rspec-expectation2 > rubygem-rspec-mocks2 > > ? You already said here "the naming scheme for these >RSpec 2 packages<", so it should mention "rspec2", not "core2" or "expectation2". Some similar namings are "python2-foo" v.s. "python3-foo", not "python-foo2" or "python-foo3". > That would match the convention we use for all the other packages. No, it is opposite. > Also, > when looking for rubygem-rspec in package db, one would immediately see that > the old 2.x version is around. What do you think? Could you change it? The > naming scheme you have chosen implies more that core, expectation and mocks > are sub-packages of rspec package. Essentially so, because even currently when we do "yum install rubygem-rspec", it pulls in -core, -expectations, -mocks. Similarly, when we do "yum install rubygem-rspec2", it should pull in "-rspec2-core", "-mocks", "-expectations", and it almost looks like these are subpackages of rubygem-rspec2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review