https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 --- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny <jstribny@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Mamoru, I talked with Vit briefly and we discussed the naming scheme for these RSpec 2 packages. Don't you think it would be better to name them as: rubygem-rspec-core2 rubygem-rspec-expectation2 rubygem-rspec-mocks2 ? That would match the convention we use for all the other packages. Also, when looking for rubygem-rspec in package db, one would immediately see that the old 2.x version is around. What do you think? Could you change it? The naming scheme you have chosen implies more that core, expectation and mocks are sub-packages of rspec package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review