https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #19 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Martín Buenahora from comment #18) > I have a doubt about the version. The upstream have releases, as you have > seen, but they aren't really defined (I remember one commit that said > something like "Is been a while since a new release"), so I don't know if I > should come back to the releases, or if I should stay with the git version > (I would use "<date>git<short commit>" rather than "<date>git"). You could also "do the AUR way" and use a suffix, that means 'screenfetch-git' as a (temporary) package name, till there would be any main release at upstream. So there could be two packages (git and "official" release). Just as an idea, you're of course free to name your package as you prefer if the guidelines comply. See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review