https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554 --- Comment #24 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #23) > (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #21) > > There are 3 ways > > 1. Patch the sources. > > 2. Report it to upstream and wait until they implement it. > > 3. Abstain from packaging a package. > > > > 1. is the way of least resistance and should not be difficult to implement. > > So that would mean a fork of the fork for booster. I hoped that my two links > make it more clear to understand why Fedora policy doesn't comply with > upstream guidelines. So instead 3. seems to be the best way to handle it > with lowest resistance. :-( So be it - Sometimes upstreams need to learn the hard way they are doing a poor job. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review