[Bug 1103554] Review Request: cppcms - a Free High Performance Web Development Framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554



--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #21)
> There are 3 ways
> 1. Patch the sources.
> 2. Report it to upstream and wait until they implement it.
> 3. Abstain from packaging a package.
> 
> 1. is the way of least resistance and should not be difficult to implement.

So that would mean a fork of the fork for booster. I hoped that my two links
make it more clear to understand why Fedora policy doesn't comply with upstream
guidelines. So instead 3. seems to be the best way to handle it with lowest
resistance. :-(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]