https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124 --- Comment #56 from Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > The point of the warning is to catch stuff that installs only architecture- > independent stuff into %{_libdir}, which would be better put into %{_datadir} > or %{_libexecdir}. But this is not the case here, the warning is a false > positive (and since it's an obvious case, it should be reported as a bug to > rpmlint, really). Thanks a lot for the explanation. Tagged the mail as todo so I do not forget reporting the issue against rpmlint. > Copy&paste error there. Thanks a lot. Fixed locally. Waiting for more severe issues for kicking off builds. > I really think the packaging of qbs in Fedora is over complicated. I am sorry to hear that. I was still open to take input on this subpackage splitups. But after I pointed out my points I did not receive any input on it so I sticked on it. As you can see this new release already adds two new modules... If I would put everything into the same package I fear that it would be pretty annoying later on and splitting it later again would be a lot more complex (How could I even split out a module later? One person might need it so to prevent confusion during the update I would need to add a Requires: to it. But another person might have never used it and would end up installing the subpackage he does not need). But still thanks a lot for all the input so far! Regards, Erik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review