https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790 --- Comment #22 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The tarball has changed without changing the version again. This is bad practice. The `Release' tag indicates only changes in Fedora packaging -- if you, as upstream change the code itself, you should also bump the version (as in the `Version' tag). This was already pointed out by Michael in comment #4. Your upstream changelog refers to Fedora package releases but what if other distributions want to package your software? If you feel this is just a minor update, release something like 1.6.1 and then reset the `Release' number in Fedora, so it becomes 1.6.1-1... that's just an example, the versioning scheme doesn't matter. Just realise those are two different things -- the upstream version and the Fedora package version. (In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #20) > > Update the Texinfo index before the package gets uninstalled, i.e. in a > > %preun section, not %postun. > > Fixed. That solved it, it was bugging me because rpm was always complaining > on removing the package. Ack, handled well now. > > Also, your Texinfo files have strange permissions (755). Remove the > > executable bits. > > Fixed. These bit permissions are set by install-info. I changed the files > permission in the %files section. Nope. This was done by the `install' command (currently lines 51-54). It'd be more clear if you used the -m option instead of the %attr macro. See install(1) for details. The package is in a passable state but I'll let you do another respin just for practice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review