Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-brutus Alias: evolution-brutus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203520 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-24 14:26 EST ------- Well, for 1.1.25.9-2: * Requires - For devel package, it seems that gpgme-devel, e2fsprogs-devel are not needed. Note: I usually check by: A: ------------------------------------------------------------------- $ LANG=C grep 'include ' `rpm -ql evolution-brutus-devel` | grep -v Binary | sed -e 's|^.*:||' | sed -e 's|^[ \t][ \t]*||' | sort | uniq ------------------------------------------------------------------- B: ------------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -ql evolution-brutus-devel | grep '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/.*.pc' | xargs cat | grep Requires ------------------------------------------------------------------- = License is okay for all 263 files * Removing documentation ------------------------------------------------------------------- # Don't bother to pack unnecessary docs. rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/INSTALL rm -f %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/building_from_source ------------------------------------------------------------------- - Just the following? ------------------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-devel-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review