https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124070 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Suggestions: 1) spec file name should not contain any version or release. I suppose its a typo in the initial comment for Spec URL. 2) If you are not planning to add this package to EPEL6 then remove following from spec a) Group tag is now optional and can be removed. b) "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is not needed anymore as its done automatically by rpmbuild c) similarly %clean section is also not needed anymore 3) %prep should contain only %setup -q 4) Though there is no compilation or building of binary files happening, you can include empty %build to let rpmlint happy 5) Don't add extra empty spaces in the spec file like one you have line 59 6) I think you can if wanted keep the priority of fontconfig file to 69. Generally 60-69 numbers are used for "generic aliases, map generic->family" and you have the same fontconfig rule. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review