[Bug 226337] Merge Review: pyparted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: pyparted


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226337


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium

wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?,
                   |                            |needinfo?(dcantrell@xxxxxxxx
                   |                            |om)




------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-20 10:15 EST -------
I am planning on reviewing this one, but I have a few questions/suggestions,
before doing an official full review:

- rpmlint has a couple of complaints on the src.rpm:
W: pyparted no-url-tag
W: pyparted mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 27)
The "no-url-tag" is of course propagated to the binary rpms, too.
Maybe you could fix those? 
- I notice CFLAGS is explicitely set :
export CFLAGS="-fPIC -O2 -g2"
If there is a good reason to override the default compiler options (including
the -fortify and so on), please be as kind as to explain it.
- SMP flags are not used; if their usage breaks compilation, please state that
in the spec, otherwise please use them
- The theory says that %makeinstall should be avoided, if possible. I assume it
is a must in this case? If so, could you please add a comment in the spec, to
make it clear ?
- I suggest adding AUTHORS and Changelog to the list of files, so that we know
who to bug in case of trouble :)


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]