https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121358 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- $ rpmlint xmlrpc-epi xmlrpc-epi-devel xmlrpc-epi-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib xmlrpc-epi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Naming: ok License: ok Sources: ok 081e605491429cda17c5f021f211b8fd xmlrpc-epi-0.54.2.tar.bz2 scriptlets: ok 1. SHOULD omit deprecated .spec constructs including: Group:,BuildRoot: tags %defattr lines (empty) %clean section 2. -devel subpkg MUST use %{?_isa} for main dep dependency, like: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} 3. SHOULD document the need/use-of rm -r %{buildroot}%{_bindir} in %install section (preferably in a .spec comment) As far as I can tell, this is not needed, and can be removed. 4. SHOULD drop uneccessary BuildRequires: libtool 5. document (or remove) this item in %build section: cp -pv [A-Z]* .. As far as I can tell, this is not needed, and can be removed. 6. SHOULD explicitly track library soname (so bumps aren't surprising). e.g. replace %{_libdir}/libxmlrpc-epi.so.* with %{_libdir}/libxmlrpc-epi.so.0* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review