https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119197 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng <i@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Chen Chen from comment #4) > Because I seperated my patch from the original git snapshot. You should use a released tarball from the official website, then rebase your patch. No comments around there, I don't know where you got the sources. Your source0 contains no URL and as a result it's untrusted. Please use the full link. > My patch involved tweaking the configure.ac, thus cause a full "autoreconf" > in %prep stage and pulled in a long list of build dependency. The build > dependency list is generated via auto-buildrequires > (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/auto-buildrequires) That tool is a crap nowadays, and that long list generated is also a crap. You need to know what gnushogi needs for the building, not let tool teach you how to find the dependencies. Don't be sloppy. Also your patch only invokes the check of the texinfo and it doesn't make sense to me that such a horrendous list of BRs should be pulled in, it's wrong. Please read carefully: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > Koji Build output: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7142190 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7142198 Successful build indicates nothing as the package you sent here doesn't match the guideline. And your name also caught my eyes as well, just a note to ensure that please use your real name here if possible in most cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review