[Bug 1115049] Review Request: freight - A modern take on the Debian archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115049



--- Comment #3 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner <dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Dominic Cleal from comment #2)
> > [ ] Please add (#1115049) to the inital comment in the spec-file
> 
> Done, wasn't exactly sure what style this should have, let me know if it
> should be different.

[ ] Instead of 
- Initial version
It should be
- Initial version (#1115049)
There is no written rule to do so. But it makes it much easier to go back and
find the inital ticket later.

[ ] Now you missed to increment the release field for the changes to and write
a short comment about what have changed. Some kind of:

* Tue Jul 08 2014 Dominic Cleal <dcleal@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.3.5-2
- Added LICENSE, NOTES and README.md to files-section
- Added initial tickernumber to initial comment

* Tue Jul 01 2014 Dominic Cleal <dcleal@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.3.5-1
- Initial version (#1115049)

[ ] Instead of
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}
cp -a LICENSE NOTES README.md %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}
It should be
%doc LICENSE NOTES README.md
After %files

[ ] I'm not quite happy about:
mv %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}.conf{.example,}
I miss the whitespace between the source and the destination. Or am I wrong?
Using install -p would be better, too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]