https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825409 --- Comment #43 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- gazebo_physics and friends should also be linked with gazebo_ode. gazebo-ode is a fork of the ODE package in Fedora, and I'm working through the fedora packaging committee to make sure I abide by the bundled library rules. I split it into a separate sub-package as per the advice in https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/317 As far as the other things you pointed out, most of them are easy fixes. The gazebo-media as owner of /usr/share/gazebo-3.0/* could use some more thought though. I think almost all of the stuff in the media subdirectory is used for the gui, so we can probably get away with: gazebo-common: /usr/share/gazebo-3.0 directory structure gazebo: executables, desktop file, manuals, gazebo plugin libraries (libdir/gazebo), setup script (/usr/share/gazebo-3.0/setup.sh) Requires: gazebo-common Requires: gazebo-media gazebo-libs: versioned shared libraries gazebo-libs-devel: unversioned libraries, headers, cmake, pkgconfig, examples Requires: gazebo-common gazebo-ode: ode fork gazebo-ode-devel: ode fork libraries gazebo-media: assets Requires: gazebo gazebo-doc: html documentation player-gazebo: Player plugin and example configurations Requires: gazebo-common I'm not sure if gazebo-libs-devel should just be called gazebo-devel, or if it should have a Provides: for gazebo devel so that people that want to build against gazebo don't get tripped up when they try to install gazebo-devel and it's unavailable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review