Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-bsearch - Binary search library for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236492 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-15 06:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Prereview as I'm still awaiting a sponsor: > > [build@ip-50 SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba ruby-bsearch.spec > sh: ruby: command not found > sh: ruby: command not found > sh: ruby: command not found > error: Failed build dependencies: > ruby is needed by ruby-bsearch-1.5-1.noarch ruby is in BuildRequires. (In reply to comment #2) > From ReviewGuidelines: > SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Check bsearch.en.rd > Also, according to bsearch.rb, it is licensed under ruby's license, which > looking at /usr/share/doc/ruby-1.8.5.35/COPYING is GPL plus a custom one. Might > be better to reference as Ruby(GPL)? I don't know the Ruby(GPL) license tag. ruby uses "Ruby License/GPL", and actually this is a simple dual license and referring to the license as GPL is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review