https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315 --- Comment #37 from MartinKG <mgansser@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #36) > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages > > > Unversioned so-files > > -------------------- > > nuvolaplayer: /usr/lib64/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so > > nuvolaplayer: /usr/lib64/nuvolaplayer/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so > > Careful reviewing needed here. The DevelPackages guidelines try to cover > this in the bottom half of that section. > > Is this library needed at runtime as some sort of plugin library? If so, it > must _not_ be stored in a -devel subpackage. > > Also note that the lib is found in two paths: in runtime linker's search > path, %_libdir, and in a private subdir that is not within runtime linker's > search path, %_libdir/nuvolaplayer. Why is that? Are the files linked or > copies of eachother? > > > Requires > > -------- > > nuvolaplayer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > … > > libnuvolaplayerprivate.so()(64bit) > > … when i exclude the second libnuvolaplayerprivate.so in rpm spec file %exclude %{_libdir}/%{name}/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so an want to install the package i get this error message: rpm -ivh nuvolaplayer-2.3.3-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libnuvolaplayerprivate.so()(64bit) is needed by nuvolaplayer-2.3.3-2.fc20.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review