https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315 --- Comment #36 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > Issues: > ======= > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages > Unversioned so-files > -------------------- > nuvolaplayer: /usr/lib64/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so > nuvolaplayer: /usr/lib64/nuvolaplayer/libnuvolaplayerprivate.so Careful reviewing needed here. The DevelPackages guidelines try to cover this in the bottom half of that section. Is this library needed at runtime as some sort of plugin library? If so, it must _not_ be stored in a -devel subpackage. Also note that the lib is found in two paths: in runtime linker's search path, %_libdir, and in a private subdir that is not within runtime linker's search path, %_libdir/nuvolaplayer. Why is that? Are the files linked or copies of eachother? > Requires > -------- > nuvolaplayer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > … > libnuvolaplayerprivate.so()(64bit) > … -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review