https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095662 --- Comment #4 from David Dick <ddick@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > (In reply to David Dick from comment #2) > > (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1) > > > Are the explicit run-requires in the virtdetect package necessary? > > > > It was the only way i knew to remove the requires for Getopt::Long, POSIX, > > etc from perl-Sys-Detect-Virtualization (where they are not required) and > > keep them in virtdetect (where they are). Suggestions? > > You don't need to remove them at all; they're not there :) > Just drop the req filters in the main package and explicit run requires in > the virtdetect one. It will work like a charm. The dependencies (and > provides) are put in the packages according to what files they include. Hmmm... yes it does.. filters and explicit run requires removed. > > > It might not be obvious to the user that virtdetect is a subpackage of this > > > one; maybe packaging the README in its own %doc would be a good idea? > > > > Okay. Along the same sort of line, i thought including the Changelog would > > be useful too? > > Could be but I find it somewhat less important; the README points the user > to the main package which is installed and provides the Changelog already. Okay. removed Changelog file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review