https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094864 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- >- filtering private is no more needed in f20+ (and rhel7) Obviously i've missing something. Where it stated? Meantime if it is not targeted to El5 i'm prefer leave it for Fedora 19. >- why don't you provide the -devel sub package ? (with the installed header, and perhaps the upstream test suite... useful as documentation) I don't know anything which may use it, do you? Is it have worth at all? Other issues addressed. Changes: https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/15c7414d9415d4755c37f0ee8e9ff9897b20159f Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/15c7414d9415d4755c37f0ee8e9ff9897b20159f/SPECS/php-pecl-xmldiff.spec Srpm: http://hubbitus.info/rpm/Fedora20/php-pecl-xmldiff/php-pecl-xmldiff-0.9.2-2.fc20.src.rpm One additional question which I had been intended ask in ML. That pecl extension require dom.so also to be turned on. For tests I do that explicitly and provide requires. But what if that installed, but then disabled by user on target system? Then installation of php-pecl-xmldiff lead to malfunction extension. I could add "extension=dom.so" before this extension itself. Is it documented anywhere? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review