[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517



--- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@xxxxxxx> ---
Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but
I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no guarantee
that Julia will work with any newer versions without changes. So it may be
better to retain the manual update solution.

I'll also have a look at the network access issue.

baurthefirst: Thanks, I didn't know about copr, and I wasn't able to use Koji
since utf8proc and openlibm are not present there. I'll have a look. Since
Julia opens libraries at run time, it may indeed try to acces libopenblas.so
rather than libopenblas-r0.2.8.so or the equivalent, and therefore require
opneblas-devel. This should probably be fixed uptsream.


Meanwhile, I've filed a bundling exception request at
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/427

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]