https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583 --- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Darryl L. Pierce from comment #6) > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #3) > > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > > Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/qpid, /usr/lib64/qpid/client, > > /usr/lib64/qpid/daemon > > > > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > > Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/rc.d/init.d, > > /usr/lib64/qpid/daemon, /usr/libexec/qpid, /etc/rc.d, > > /usr/lib64/qpid/client > > It shouldn't own /etc/rc.d/init.d or /etc/rc.d. Others should be fine. That would be fine, yes. > > > [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > > See my previous comment about compat-qpid-cpp and qpid-cpp being > intentionally conflicting packages. > Thanks for the clarification! :) > > Generic: > > [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. > > Not sure why this was flagged, the build does in fact use parallel make > which is desirable and not a red flag. Is the review tool having some issues? > > > Generic: > > [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > > Note: Mock build failed > > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint > > [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros > > Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. > > See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools > > The build doesn't use the autotools chain, but uses Cmake. Yeah - I was also wondering about that.... > > Also fixed the Requires for compat packages that were still drawing in > qpid-cpp packages. > > Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6796076 > Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec > Updated SRPM: > http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-4.fc20.src.rpm I will try to get this done later this evening. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review