https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083941 --- Comment #17 from Han Frederic <han@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > %{_datadir}/applications and %{_datadir}/pixmaps are owned by a main system > package (filesystem). Your package doesn't need to own them. > > Verify with command: > > yum provides /usr/share/pixmaps /usr/share/applications good, so the answer is dir of the package filesystem must not be owned by our package > /usr/share/icons is not in the review log (comment#14) and should not be > owned by your package. Yes it was an example for my question > Not even /usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages. > Sorry, I had not noted the latter ones. Sorry I am lost, do I missunderstand the comma presentation? /usr/share/mime and /usr/share/mime/packages look to be in your review of [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/mimetypes, /usr/share/giac/doc/de, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/mime, <<<===here?=== .... /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/mimetypes, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/mime/packages, <<<===here?=== .... but they belong to: shared-mime-info-1.2-2.fc21.x86_64 so was I right to package those dir? > > About 5. I removed the extra +x, and add a warning about the .xws Indeed, > > they are not text files, they are saved examples from xcas and any uft8 > > conversion will give a mess. Is there some way to mark them as non text > > files to avoid those warning? > > All the best. > > I think we can just ignore all file-not-utf8 warnings ;) Good! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review