[Bug 235805] New: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805

           Summary: Review Request: camlimages - OCaml image processing
                    library
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: dev@xxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx


Spec URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages.spec
SRPM URL: http://dev.nigelj.com/SRPMS/camlimages-2.2.0-1.src.rpm
Description: 
CamlImages is an image processing library for Objective CAML, which provides:
 basic functions for image processing and loading/saving
 various image file formats (hence providing a translation facility from
  format to format)
 an interface with the Caml graphics library allows to display
  images in the Graphics module screen and to mix them with Caml drawings

In addition, the library can handle huge images that cannot be (or can hardly
be) stored into the main memory (the library then automatically creates swap
files and escapes them to reduce the memory usage).

rpmlint:
camlimages-2.2.0-1.i386.rpm:
W: camlimages ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/dllci_jpeg.so
(I don't know if an exception can be made here, I can't find much on the problem)
camlimages-devel-2.2.0-1.i386.rpm:
W: camlimages-devel no-documentation
W: camlimages-devel ocaml-naming-policy-not-applied /usr/lib/ocaml/camlimages/Makefile.config
(1: docs are in the main package, which is strictly depended on, 2: Ditto about exception)
camlimages-2.2.0-1.src.rpm:
Clean

Like with ocamlSDL (235804) I believe the files are in the right place etc etc, but I have one note:
One package which depends on this (which I'm putting in for Package Review later today), depends on this for building, but not for use, I'm worried that the libraries are somehow been configured statically, not sure if it's a problem with this package or the other package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]