Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221884 ------- Additional Comments From andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-08 21:46 EST ------- Sorry this took so long. I've been doing a lot of refactoring and stability work on pybackpack recently. No shiny new features or big performance fixes I'm afraid, mostly reworking the code to make it easier to maintain. But nonetheless I've made a new release (0.5.0): Spec, SRPM and RPM: http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack.spec http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.0-1.src.rpm http://andrewprice.me.uk/projects/pybackpack/download/pybackpack-0.5.0-1.noarch.rpm You may not see much difference between the previous version and this version on the surface but development should start to pick up momentum now that the codebase is starting to become sane. I'm going to be crazy busy with university stuff until the middle of June but I'll try to keep the bug fixes coming and keep you posted at least once a month. Thanks again for your time. I appreciate the feedback even if the package is still far from Fedora-worthy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review