https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 --- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan <nonamedotc@xxxxxxxxx> --- > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) > > I only have one question about the license - It is my understanding that > > license not provided by upstream cannot be included. > > > > Please clarify. > > See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > which states: > > In cases where the upstream has chosen a license that requires > > that a copy of the license text be distributed along with the > > binaries and/or source code, but does not provide a copy of the > > license text (in the source tree, or in some rare cases, > > anywhere), the packager should do their best to point out this > > confusion to upstream. > > > > However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, > > or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the > > source code, and the indicated license requires that the full > > license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: > > > > - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is > > intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in > > order to remain in compliance. Hi! Sorry - I think I was not very clear. I had referred to the guidelines and what I wanted to ask is actually in the quoted text - "However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the source code, and the indicated license requires that the full license text be included .... " Is this (unresponsive/unable, etc.) the case or would you prefer to wait a couple of days for upstream to (potentially) add the license? If you think it does not make a big difference, I am perfectly fine with approving the package as my understanding is that the current status is still in compliance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review