https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081726 Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: CutyCapt - |qt5-CutyCapt - A small |A small command-line |command-line utility to |utility to capture WebKit's |capture WebKit's rendering |rendering of a web page |of a web page | --- Comment #5 from Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I noticed that I missed the reference to LGPL, so I've amended the License tag. I believe I also incorrectly named this package with a "qt5-" prefix, which I think is just for packages that are part of the base Qt5 software. I've renamed to just CutyCapt. Spec URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/CutyCapt/CutyCapt.spec SRPM URL: http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/CutyCapt/SRPMS/CutyCapt-0-0.2.20130714svn.fc21.src.rpm * Sat Mar 29 2014 Jamie Nguyen <jamielinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0-0.2.20130714svn - rename to CutyCapt - include copies of both GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 - amend License tag (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) > I only have one question about the license - It is my understanding that > license not provided by upstream cannot be included. > > Please clarify. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text which states: > In cases where the upstream has chosen a license that requires > that a copy of the license text be distributed along with the > binaries and/or source code, but does not provide a copy of the > license text (in the source tree, or in some rare cases, > anywhere), the packager should do their best to point out this > confusion to upstream. > > However, in situations where upstream is unresponsive, unable, > or unwilling to provide proper full license text as part of the > source code, and the indicated license requires that the full > license text be included, Fedora Packagers must either: > > - Include a copy of what they believe the license text is > intended to be, as part of the Fedora package in %doc, in > order to remain in compliance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review