[Bug 1080094] Review Request: python-fedmsg-genacls - A fedmsg consumer that sets gitosis acls in response to pkgdb messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080094

Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Review:

+ Package built successfully in mock rawhide

+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
python-fedmsg-genacls.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gitosis ->
mitosis, halitosis
python-fedmsg-genacls.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) acls -> aces,
ails, acts
python-fedmsg-genacls.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pkgdb -> pkg db,
pkg-db, pkg
python-fedmsg-genacls.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pkgdb ->
pkg db, pkg-db, pkg
python-fedmsg-genacls.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gitosis -> mitosis,
halitosis
python-fedmsg-genacls.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) acls -> aces, ails,
acts
python-fedmsg-genacls.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pkgdb -> pkg db,
pkg-db, pkg
python-fedmsg-genacls.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pkgdb -> pkg
db, pkg-db, pkg
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.

+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum)
srpm tarball:321d70af11cef939a6d665dd32accdec0e0efedf2c1b36723b038ddcf70c5ff4
upstream
tarball:321d70af11cef939a6d665dd32accdec0e0efedf2c1b36723b038ddcf70c5ff4

+ License is valid and included in LICENSE file

+ rest looks as per packaging guidelines

Suggestions:
1) Either own /etc/fedmsg.d or add Requires: on package that owns that
directory but I see fedmsg package should actually own it, please fix fedmsg
package.

2) If this is only fedora spec then you don't need Group tag and python
conditional macro definition at top of spec. Otherwise follow EPEL specific
guideliens like buildroot, %clean, defattr, removal of buildroot in %install

3) cp or install commands should follow "-p" to preserve timestamp of upstream
files being copied in the system.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]