https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069257 --- Comment #33 from Till Hofmann <hofmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #32) > Anyway, if you say MPFR/GMP is not needed, only the three headers ought to > be dropped. Shipping internal headers is not a great idea. Eventually > somebody would start including them. I'm not saying it isn't needed, but it isn't essential. I don't think it would be a good idea to build the library with MPFR/GMP support without adding dependencies to these libraries, so I guess not supporting MPFR/GMP altogether is the best solution (as we discussed earlier). If somebody needs MPFR/GMP support, they can still use fparser as copylib. That said, I removed the internal header files from the package. I also had another look at the debian package. They use some macros in configure.ac which don't seem to have any effect (because they define something which isn't used/checked by fparser). Other than that, it is similar to ours (yours). I moved the autoreconf call to %prep. Thanks for your help! SPEC: http://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/fparser.spec SRPM http://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/fparser-4.5.1-7.fc20.src.rpm patch: http://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/fparser.autotools.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review