https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065685 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Achilleas Pipinellis from comment #3) > About my second query the answer is here [0]. So you must include the top > level directory which will include the entire tree below it. That addresses > to `%{gem_extdir_mri}/*`. Actually, it should be %{gem_extdir_mri} to own the directory and its content. By specifying %{gem_extdir_mri}/* you says you own just the content, but not the directory itself. > In my previous comment I missed that you don't include `%dir > %{gem_instdir}`. That would solve the `No known owner of > /usr/share/gems/gems/unicorn-4.8.2/bin` issue. Then i guess you could also > omit the `%{gem_instdir}/bin/unicorn` and > `%{gem_instdir}/bin/unicorn_rails` macros. No, that is wrong. The %dir directive says that only the specified directory is owned, not its content. If you check the files section closely, only the files under %{gem_instdir}/bin/ are explicitly owned, but the directory itself is not. To solve this, either add "%dir %{gem_instdir}/bin/" or remove the explicitly specified content of bin dir. The former is more secure, since you have better control over the bindir content. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review