https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060910 Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jakub Hrozek from comment #3) > Issues: > ======= > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Sorry, I didn't add a comment properly. As discussed in bug #1060909, this is probably the best way to go and allow the preloading (which is the point of the wrappers) easily. I short, I don't have any issues with the package. It's very similar to socket_wrapper which already passed a review, so it went quite smooth. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review