[Bug 894589] Review Request: coin-or-Alps - COIN-OR High-Performance Parallel Search Framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589



--- Comment #9 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #8)
> (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
> > > - /usr/include/coin has still not any owner.
> > > See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7
> > 
> >   It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel
> > requires does not explicitly require the owner of the
> > directory, what should be fixed now.
> > 
> > $ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin
> > coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64
> 
> coin-or-CoinUtils-devel owns that directory only in the package f21; I
> checked in Fedora 20 (2.9.0-3) instead. :P

  I can make an update. Just that I am still half way in
adding coin-or-* projects/packages to Fedora, so I did not
bother earlier to update f20, sorry :-(

> > > - I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package.
> > 
> >   I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because
> > doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better
> > not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases.
> 
> I agree; I mean -doc may even not require '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}'.

  That is something to think about :-) but usually if someone
wants documentation, also wants devel and runtime.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]