https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894589 --- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #7) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6) > > - /usr/include/coin has still not any owner. > > See your comment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894586#c7 > > It has an owner, the problem should be that the -devel > requires does not explicitly require the owner of the > directory, what should be fixed now. > > $ rpm -qf /usr/include/coin > coin-or-CoinUtils-devel-2.9.7-3.fc21.x86_64 coin-or-CoinUtils-devel owns that directory only in the package f21; I checked in Fedora 20 (2.9.0-3) instead. :P > > > - I think, -doc sub-package can be independent by main package. > > I am following an earlier advice from Jerry James, because > doxygen documentation is (frequently) quite large, and is better > not being owned by the main or devel packages on those cases. I agree; I mean -doc may even not require '%{name} = %{version}-%{release}'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review