[Bug 1056555] Review Request: ioprocess - process to perform risky IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056555



--- Comment #4 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Hello Saggi,

I couldn't see in my previous review but I do believe your package should be
renamed to python-ioprocess [1] since you provide a python binding for the
/usr/libexec/ioprocess right?

Other option:
Split your package into two.

- ioprocess which contains the libexec/ioprocess binary and docs. 
- python-ioprocess which is the module to access the ioprocess [1]

Almost forgot: Rename the deprecated macro
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
"
The unversioned macros, %{__python}, %{python_sitelib}, and %{python_sitearch}
are deprecated. You should use %{__python2}, %{python2_sitelib}, and
%{python2_sitearch} to explicitly reference the python2 interpreter instead.
This is future proofing for the time when things will be switched over to
python3 by default instead of python2.
"

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29

After this review, your package seems good to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]