https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070671 --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4) > Based on this > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your > _package_to_function), I think the ownership looks fine unless > perl-Test-Kwalitee is required. > > Is this the case? If not, I can approve the package. Well, as you can see from the Requires list, perl-Test-Kwalitee is not required. However, even if it did, the directory ownership shouldn't change - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Directory_Ownership The reason for this is that perl packages can either be arch-specific or arch-independent, and the modules get installed to different directories dependent on which type of module they are. Perl modules also sometimes change between arch-specific and arch-independent, so even if in this case perl-Test-Kwalitee was required, you wouldn't be sure that it would provide the necessary parent directory (the arch-independent one in this case), because an update to perl-Test-Kwalitee might change it to be arch-specific, and hence own a different set of directories. So the perl ecosystem just shares the module directories between all modules that use them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review