https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066176 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #7) > So the source tarball name with "Makefile.dist-packaging" is always named > after a variant of "git describe". In this case, the tarball is being built > from a tag named "v2014.1", so the version is just 2014.1. That seems reasonable, but the point of the comment is so the person looking doesn't have to figure out of you are reasonable or not, and in which of several perfectly valid ways *you* are reasonable. :) So it should go into the specfile comment. >> And I also hate to be difficult about the changelog, but that's a "must" >> item in the packaging guidelines. > For now... =) A lot of *all* of this is about a separation between developer and packager roles. You're acting as both, and I think have a bias towards the developer side. That's not inherently bad, but tilting the way we do things in that direction is... well, too big of a conversation for this bug. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review