https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055837 --- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes <richmattes@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks Kenjiro and Michael. I'm not sure that the make command for all the doxygen targets is necessary, but it doesn't hurt so I added it. I don't know where the Group tag came from, I think maybe rpmdev-newspec put it there or I copied it from an older spec. Either way, I've just removed it for Fedora. The CMake requirement was just for directory, it is still possible to use the -devel package without CMake. I didn't know about that guideline, thanks for pointing it out. I've made the simbody-devel package own datadir/cmake as per the guidlines. You're also right about the doc subpackage. I made it noarch. Finally, I fixed rpmlint warnings about the unused shared lib dependencies by adding -Wl,--as-needed to the package's link flags. I also re-arranged the CMake flags so that the "sse2" instruction option is only passed in the x86_64 case, and updated to the latest upstream release. Updated packages at: Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/simbody/simbody.spec SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/simbody/simbody-3.3.1-1.fc20.src.rpm rpmlint: $ rpmlint ./simbody.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/simbody*3.3.1* ../RPMS/noarch/simbody*3.3.1* simbody.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Multi -> Mulch, Mufti simbody.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti simbody.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US neuro -> euro, neuron, negro simbody.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSimTKmath.so.3.3 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 simbody.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary VisualizerGUI simbody-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6528496 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review