https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006860 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #9) > > If no problems here, please approve. Thanks again. > You did you change anything on your package? You once againd did increment > the NEVR, so their is nothing to approve. Actually nothing because they are the same with the one in the previous link. You pointed the fault in Sep, then I fixed it immediately in spite of leaving it here for 2 months and in Nov I checked again my remaining bugs, because at that time new version was released, so I included my fix in the new version SRPM, therefore no need to bump. Sandro still deemed that this had problem just because the spec is not coherent with the SRPM. Spec URL: http://cicku.me/libnatpmp.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libnatpmp-20131126-1.fc21.src.rpm Reserved for Ralf: SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/libnatpmp-20131126-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review