[Bug 989847] Review Request: mingw-plibc - MinGW package for plibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989847

Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
$ rpmlint mingw-plibc.spec
mingw-plibc.spec:13: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-plibc.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: plibc-code-147-trunk.zip
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint mingw-plibc-0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20.src.rpm 
mingw-plibc.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libc -> lib, lib c
mingw-plibc.src:13: W: macro-in-comment %{snapshot_rev}
mingw-plibc.src: W: invalid-url Source0: plibc-code-147-trunk.zip
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings

$ rpmlint mingw32-plibc-0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20.noarch.rpm
mingw64-plibc-0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20.noarch.rpm 
mingw32-plibc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libc -> lib, lib
c
mingw32-plibc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-plibc/COPYING
mingw32-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw32-plibc/COPYING
mingw32-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plibc.h
mingw32-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/langinfo.h
mingw64-plibc.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libc -> lib, lib
c
mingw64-plibc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-plibc/COPYING
mingw64-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/mingw64-plibc/COPYING
mingw64-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/plibc.h
mingw64-plibc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/langinfo.h
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 4 warnings.


$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-plibc
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw32(advapi32.dll)
mingw32(comdlg32.dll)
mingw32-crt
mingw32-filesystem >= 95
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libintl-8.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
mingw32(ole32.dll)
mingw32(shell32.dll)
mingw32(user32.dll)
mingw32(ws2_32.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

$ rpm --query --requires mingw64-plibc
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
mingw64(advapi32.dll)
mingw64(comdlg32.dll)
mingw64-crt
mingw64-filesystem >= 95
mingw64(kernel32.dll)
mingw64(libintl-8.dll)
mingw64(msvcrt.dll)
mingw64(ole32.dll)
mingw64(shell32.dll)
mingw64(user32.dll)
mingw64(ws2_32.dll)
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

$ rpm --query --requires mingw32-libmicrohttpd-static
mingw32-libmicrohttpd = 0.9.33-1.fc20
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1

$ rpm --query --requires mingw64-libmicrohttpd-static
mingw64-libmicrohttpd = 0.9.33-1.fc20
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1


$ rpm --query --provides mingw32-plibc
mingw32-plibc = 0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20
mingw32(libplibc-1.dll)

$ rpm --query --provides mingw64-plibc
mingw64-plibc = 0.1.7-0.2.20130812svn147.fc20
mingw64(libplibc-1.dll)


+ OK
! Needs to be looked into
/ Not applicable

[!] Compliant with generic Fedora Packaging Guidelines
[+] Source package name is prefixed with 'mingw-'
[+] Spec file starts with %{?mingw_package_header}
[+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] BuildRequires: mingw64-filesystem >= 95 is in the .spec file
[+] Spec file contains %package sections for both mingw32 and mingw64 packages
[+] Binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are noarch
[+] Spec file contains %{?mingw_debug_package} after the %description section
[+] Uses one of the macros %mingw_configure, %mingw_cmake, or %mingw_cmake_kde4
    to configure the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to build the package
[+] Uses the macro %mingw_make to install the package
[/] If package contains translations, the %mingw_find_lang macro must be used
[+] No binary package named mingw-$pkgname is generated
[+] Libtool .la files are not bundled
[+] .def files are not bundled
[+] Man pages which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Info files which duplicate native package are not bundled
[+] Provides of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal
[!] Requires of the binary mingw32 and mingw64 packages are equal


The invalid-url rpmlint warning can be ignored as you're using a SVN checkout
The spelling rpmlint warnings can also be ignored
The wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding and incorrect-fsf-address rpmlint warnings
should be reported upstream, but they're not blocking for this review

The mingw32 package seems to depend on libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll while the mingw64
package doesn't. I've also seen this on various other packages so we can
ignore this for now


=================================================
 The package mingw-plibc is APPROVED by epienbro
=================================================

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]