https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058163 --- Comment #4 from Jon Disnard <jdisnard@xxxxxxxxx> --- Have eliminated all but -common (noarch) sub-package. This one I would like to keep to save space on the distribution, and 3rd party mirrors. The main/single package bundles all the bins, .desktop files, and icons. But there is only one appdata file, and rpmlint complains about appdata as an error. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-19-x86_64/root//builddir/build//RPMS/glmark2-2012.12-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm ... glmark2.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/appdata/glmark2.appdata.xml ... Should I remove all the extra .desktop files to avoid spamming the Graphics category of a app menu in whatever DE ? Maybe choose only the .desktop files that goes with the appdata? Let the user run the other variants from cmdline? Removed libjpeg-turbo, but I really do feel that one is a better library. No matter, it's too trivial as you point out loading jpeg is not intense. Bumped the release. http://parasense.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/glmark2.spec http://parasense.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/glmark2-2012.12-2.fc21.src.rpm http://parasense.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/RPMS/glmark2-2012.12-2.fc21.x86_64.rpm http://parasense.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/RPMS/glmark2-common-2012.12-2.fc21.noarch.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review