[Bug 233424] Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-04-01 02:56 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=151372)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151372&action=view)
0.95-3 spec file

0.95-3:

Well, I cannot upload the whole srpm until I have my account
on my university fixed...

> Needswork:
> 
> - MUSTFIX: No License, no copyright inside of the source tarball.
See bug 233423

> - MUSTFIX: Specfile contains: %{!?python_sitearch: ...}
Just because I forgot to remove this...

> - MUSTFIX: Package doesn't acknowledge RPM_OPT_FLAGS
Fixed
 
> - MUSTFIX: Package explictly links against -lstdc++
> This is a bug in mecab-config
Fixed in mecab-0.95-2

> - SHOULDFIX: %check ||:
> The ||: in check is an anachronism to cater ancient versions of 
> rpm and should not be used.

Well, I usually do this (because one of my computer still
uses rpm-4.0.4), however I removed this.  


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]