Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-mecab - Perl binding for MeCab https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233424 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-04-01 02:56 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=151372) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151372&action=view) 0.95-3 spec file 0.95-3: Well, I cannot upload the whole srpm until I have my account on my university fixed... > Needswork: > > - MUSTFIX: No License, no copyright inside of the source tarball. See bug 233423 > - MUSTFIX: Specfile contains: %{!?python_sitearch: ...} Just because I forgot to remove this... > - MUSTFIX: Package doesn't acknowledge RPM_OPT_FLAGS Fixed > - MUSTFIX: Package explictly links against -lstdc++ > This is a bug in mecab-config Fixed in mecab-0.95-2 > - SHOULDFIX: %check ||: > The ||: in check is an anachronism to cater ancient versions of > rpm and should not be used. Well, I usually do this (because one of my computer still uses rpm-4.0.4), however I removed this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review