https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030751 --- Comment #10 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Great! > [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.3/site- > packages/__pycache__(python3-setuptools, python3-libs) What this item on the list means is: The fedora-review tool found directories in the package, which are owned by other packages already. That refers to the following part of the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package > -- Owns it's own files in cited directories, It should _not_ own /usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/__pycache__ because that one belongs into python3-libs already. Co-ownership of directories can become a problem, if one package messes up the file access permissions, for example. That's why the guidelines still try to reduce co-ownership to the exceptional cases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function [...] Not related to the Review Guidelines, but to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Examples_of_good_package_summaries > Summary: A pure python bbcode parser and formatter My alternative suggestion that also eliminates the lower-case spelling of everything: Summary: BBCode parser and formatter written in Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review