https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054831 --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- (In reply to Marcela Mašláňová from comment #9) > Funny, I'm maintainer of perl-KinoSearch even if I gave up of all my Fedora > packages. I also replied to your email, when I said I'm not interested in > EPEL maintenance. > I'll run script to remove me from all EPEL branches. Sorry for the hassle. This is exactly the case described above; it's not possible to selectively enable permissions for specific branches via SCM admin requests. I figured that an extra permissions which is easily given up is a better idea than to omit someone with interest. It might be a good idea to add yourself here -- this is useful when people determine who to ask for maintenance of EPEL branches: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo That said, it might be that you got an extra mail or two, despite you explicitly expressed non-interest in EPEL. We rely quite heavily on significant portion of Perl stack being in EPEL and I used to ask packagers about the branching by mailing <package>-owner@fp.o until I learned it's a really bad idea. Sorry for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review