https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010512 Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for making these changes, Tim. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 4 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. - ok since upstream build isn't compatible [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1546240 bytes in /usr/share - comment from earlier review still holds (but still not a blocker) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: mesos-0.16.0-2.d0cb03f.fc21.x86_64.rpm mesos-devel-0.16.0-2.d0cb03f.fc21.x86_64.rpm mesos-0.16.0-2.d0cb03f.fc21.src.rpm mesos.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/lib64/libmesos-0.16.0.so.0.0.0 mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-deploy-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-slave-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-master-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/mesos mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-slaves.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-cluster.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-log mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-local mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-cluster.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-daemon.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-slave mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-ps mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-tail mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-master mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-masters.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-masters.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-resolve mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-execute mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-cat mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-slaves.sh 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 21 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint mesos-devel mesos mesos.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups /usr/lib64/libmesos-0.16.0.so.0.0.0 mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-deploy-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-slave-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/mesos/mesos-master-env.sh.template mesos.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/mesos mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-slaves.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-cluster.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-log mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-local mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-cluster.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-daemon.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-slave mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-ps mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-tail mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-master mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-masters.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-stop-masters.sh mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-resolve mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-execute mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-cat mesos.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mesos-start-slaves.sh 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 21 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- mesos-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config libmesos-0.16.0.so.0()(64bit) mesos(x86-64) mesos (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh /usr/bin/env config(mesos) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libev.so.4()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) libglog.so.0()(64bit) libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit) libjvm.so()(64bit) libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1)(64bit) libleveldb.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libmesos-0.16.0.so.0()(64bit) libprotobuf.so.8()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libzookeeper_mt.so.2()(64bit) protobuf-python python(abi) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- mesos-devel: mesos-devel mesos-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(mesos) mesos: config(mesos) libmesos-0.16.0.so.0()(64bit) mesos mesos(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/apache/mesos/archive/d0cb03f9535ae1b6997f60f4de50ca96f6b19e70/mesos-0.16.0-d0cb03f.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : a912104a359b76631b2e67dd5e2a6e83c473351b92f67f597f8f6ba7b3ba613e CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a912104a359b76631b2e67dd5e2a6e83c473351b92f67f597f8f6ba7b3ba613e Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1010512 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review