https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728302 --- Comment #64 from Dale Macartney <dbmacartney@xxxxxxxxx> --- > > If it helps, feel free to refer to the spec I'm using here: > https://messinet.com/rpms/browser/pjproject which works well with Asterisk > 12, which I've also been building here: > https://messinet.com/rpms/browser/asterisk Thanks Antony I have made a couple of changes to your spec. rpmlint was reporting a few warnings and errors. I've shortened the summary and moved the libraries into the -devel package. There is still an error reporting relating to the license.. "incorrect-fsf-address", However I mailed upstream and I was informed this morning that the license has been corrected and will be available in the next release. Remaining errors as follows [mac@rhodey rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/pjproject.spec SRPMS/pjproject-2.1-0.6.git217740d.fc20.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/pjproject-2.1-0.6.git217740d.fc20.x86_64.rpm pjproject.x86_64: E: no-binary pjproject.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/pjproject/COPYING 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. [mac@rhodey rpmbuild]$ SPEC: http://dbmacartney.fedorapeople.org/pjproject/pjproject.spec SRPM: http://dbmacartney.fedorapeople.org/pjproject/pjproject-2.1-0.6.git217740d.fc20.src.rpm Successful scratch build below. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6420303 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review