[Bug 1016809] Review Request: rodent - Advanced user file manager for Linux/BSD systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016809



--- Comment #22 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to edscott from comment #21)
> Currently packaging of rodent.pc is not worthwhile. As of today, the only
> use it provides is to check ---when the configure script is run--- whether
> rodent modules are already installed to a different --prefix. When this
> occurs, a warning is triggered by the configure script. This helps
> developers avoid rodent version mixups.
> 
> Thus the utility of rodent.pc is currently limited to those who are building
> and installing from source. In the future, rodent-diff and rodent-fgr will
> be split into separate packages, and these two programs do require rodent
> modules, although these modules will possibly be transferred to librfm.

Hi Edscott.
It's very nice to speak to you here.

Thank you very much to have clarified to me this issue; I was about to contact
you by a post in SourceForge.

I'm modifying the Rodent package in order to exclude 'rodent.pc' packaging.

Thanks also to Michael.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]