https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047596 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> --- "version have no sense for such package, but we are used to take the rest version" ah, OK, I took the 'version' from the .xml file. "minimal version have no more sense (RHEL-4 is EOL)" cargo culted from the other specs :) "mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs" more cargo culting... "As this channel provides a lot of extensions which already exists in standard pear channel (probably all are not packaged) we should be very carefull with each package, to check file conflicts, in peardir, docdir, ..." We don't actually have much php crypt stuff packaged that I can see. I did check for conflicts other than Blowfish and didn't see any, but a double check would be welcome indeed. "A possible solution could be to set a specific pear_phpdir, pear_docdir, pear_testdir... for this channel (so in the %post of this package). but I hope this is not required and we can go without." Yeah, that was more or less my feeling - might be necessary, but let's hope not. I'll fix the things noted on import, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review