Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: aspell-ar - Word list/dictionaries for Arabic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212974 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-27 03:30 EST ------- rpmlint reported following output on SRPM and RPM E: aspell-ar no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. ==> Ok for aspell packages E: aspell-ar only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. ==> Ok for aspell packages W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build DEST_DIR = $RPM_BUILD_ROOT $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build dictdir = ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. W: aspell-ar rpm-buildroot-usage %build datadir = ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/aspell-0.60 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. E: aspell-ar no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review