Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher Alias: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-03-26 20:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #77) > Okay, how is it now? Much better. The only other issue is that you're hardcoding calls to python directly, instead of using the %{__python} macro; but this is not a blocker AFAIK, and is something you can fix if needed after you import it. Everything's fixed up; and this package (jokosher-0.9-0.1.20070325svn) is therefore APPROVED. Go aheard with the account creation requests, and Toshio Kuratomi will take you through the sponsorship process from here and onward; after which you should flag this as fedora-cvs? and request your branches, then import your package, et al.. (Thanks, Toshio!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review