Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jokosher Alias: jokosher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199029 ------- Additional Comments From snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx 2007-03-26 13:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #75) > The %files and dependencies look good now; thanks for fixing them. > > The last little bit is that your naming is still off: Your Version tag should > still be 0.9, since that is what you are distribution snapshots of. Thus, your > full EVR should look something like the following. Also (since this isn't a > data-only package) you should probably be using the %{?dist} tag to facilitate > release upgrades: > > Version: 0.9 > Release: 0.n.YYYYMMDDsvn%{?dist} > > (Increment n for each successive snapshot, then use Release: 1 for the final > version.) > > We're almost there. :] > Okay, how is it now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review